Note
This technote is not yet published.
We rely on particular tag formats to order and present Lab images to users. This Technote is intended to formalize and document those formats.
1 Tag formats for RSP Notebook Images¶
The Rubin Observatory Sciplat-Lab containers are identified via their tags. These tags have conventional formats understood by Cachemachine and used to order the images and construct their display names. For certain types of tags, it is also possible to transform the tag data into a semantic-version-compatible format, which therefore makes specifying version constraints much easier.
1.1 Tag Types¶
There are six categories of acceptible tags:
- Alias
- Release
- Weekly
- Daily
- Release Candidate
- Experimental
Anything that does not match the format of one of these tags will be categorized as:
- Unknown
1.2 Tag Fragments¶
In general, tags can be postfixed with an optional Cycle number or a
rest
set of one-or-more underscore-separated fields. The Cycle is
currently unique to T&S RSP instances, and specifies the version of XML
used in this image. It will have the form c<digits>.<digits>
where
the first group of digits is the cycle number and the second group of
digits is the build iteration for that cycle, e.g. c0019.001
.
The rest
fragment will most often encode a build datestamp, but can
be anything (but see the discussion in “Semantic Versions”).
For image types for which semantic versions are supported, both of these
fields will end up packed into the build
semver field. If both are
present in a single tag, the cycle must precede rest
.
1.3 Recommended Tag¶
Finally, there is a single unique tag, known as the “recommended tag” which is an alias tag that specifies an image that should always be pulled and put on the front of the available-images list: it is the tag that we think most users should be using most of the time (at a given RSP instance).
1.4 Note on “Semantic Version”¶
Certain tag types (“Release”, “Weekly”, “Daily”, and “Release
Candidate”) can be used to construct version numbers that are
syntactically equivalent to a semantic version
[major].[minor].[patch]
with, perhaps, prerelease and build fields
appended.
These are not actually semantic versions, in that the compatibility guarantees of true semantic versions are not present. The version numbers are constructed purely to aid sortability and version choosing, because there are excellent extant tools to manipulate semantic versions.
Within a given release type for a given image, semantic versions (if supported for that type) can be used to compare two versions of the Lab container: a higher number is more recent. Images are comparable only within a tag type. That is, the semantic versions from (e.g.) a weekly and a release image are not comparable.
The cycle
and rest
fields end up within the build field of a
semantic version. The information in cycle
is already
semver-compatible, and rest
is transformed as follows: underscores
become dots, and any nonalphanumeric characters remaining are simply
dropped.
1.5 Alias Tags¶
Alias tags are exactly those tags we do not expect to be stable. There
are currently two items in this category: the recommended tag, and
latest
, which is defined by Docker as special and is the tag-of-last
resort: if a docker image is specified without a tag, its tag is
implicitly latest
. Our builds include latest_weekly
,
latest_daily
, and latest_release
tags, but Data Management does
not make use of them in the spawner options form.
The “recommended” tag is a singleton: it is always an alias pointing
to the image that, at any moment in time, we believe most users should
be using. Conventionally, this will be a recent weekly build, and
conventionally it has been recommended
. It can be any arbitrary
string, and this will be useful, for example, to allow different
recommended images in different environments (e.g. recommended_idf
versus recommended_summit
).
Alias tags are passed in to the tag parsing machinery from the outside
as a list of strings. Only a tag that is an exact string match to one
of those strings will be categorized as an alias tag. If it is set, the
“recommended” tag will always be prepended to the alias tag list. If
the alias tag list does not include latest
, even though that is by
its nature an alias tag, the latest
image will not be prepulled.
1.5.1 Tag Format¶
An alias tag can be an arbitrary string (set in the cachemachine
configuration); conventionally the recommended tag has been
recommended
.
1.5.2 Display Name¶
The display name for an alias tag is constructed by replacing any
underscores with spaces and then titlecasing the result. Thus
recommended
has the display name Recommended
, and if the tag
perfectly_cromulent
were an alias tag, it would have the display
name Perfectly Cromulent
. This may be modified according to tag
resolution to include a list of other names this image is known by, for
instance, Recommended (Weekly 2021_20)
.
1.5.3 Semantic Version¶
The “recommended” tag does not itself have a semantic version; however the underlying image to which it is a pointer almost certainly does.
1.5.4 Notes on “recommended” category¶
The “recommended” tag is significant in that it should always be prepulled, and in that it is only an alias to another tag. The thing that distinguishes the tag designated as “recommended” from all others is that it will always be prepulled, and always will be displayed at the top of the image list in the options form.
1.5.5 Notes on alias tags¶
An alias tag requires some special handling of the tag within cachemachine to determine what the image digest corresponding to the recommended image is, and construct a mapping of its display name to the actual image–this information is used both in the spawner options form to tell the user what they’re getting with and in the Lab UI to remind the user what they’re using.
Most users will use the “recommended” tag most of the time, and the tag is generally applied to the most recent weekly build, as soon as it has been possible to certify a weekly build by subjecting it to our QA process.
Any other defined alias tags will appear in the list between “recommended” and the first of the non-alias images.
1.6 Release¶
Release images are the (roughly twice a year) official stack releases. They are intended to be kept available indefinitely, and for the RSP machinery to, at any point in time, be able to run the current release and the two prior to it. (If older releases are required, it may take some work, up to and including a separately-constructed RSP instance) to make them runnable.
1.6.1 Tag Format¶
Release tags are now of the form r[major]_[minor]_[patch]
,
e.g. r21_0_1
. Prior to Release 18, they were not
underscore-separated, e.g. r170
. The first two digits are the major
version, and the last one is the minor version. In this form, the patch
version is always 0. Cycle and rest are permitted, so, for instance,
all of r_21_0_1_c0019.001
, r_21_0_1_20210703
, and
r_21_0_1_c0019.001_20210703
are allowed.
1.6.2 Display Name¶
The display name for a release is of the form Release
r[major].[minor].patch
; thus r21_0_1
has the display name Release
r21.0.1
. Additional components (cycle and extra) are permitted and
will be appended in the following form: r21_0_1_c0020.002_20210703
becomes Release r21.0.1 (SAL Cycle 0020, Build 002) [20210703]
.
1.6.3 Semantic Version¶
The semantic version of a release tag is, actually,
[major].[minor].[patch]
. r21_0_1
has version 21.0.1
.
Cycle and build version will be added as described above. Thus:
r21_0_1_c0020.002_20210703
would have the semantic version
21.0.1+c0020.002.20210703
.
1.6.4 Notes on “release” category¶
These tags differ from other categories by not having an underscore between the type and the release identifier. There is no reason for this other than historic convention.
1.7 Weekly¶
Weekly images are the bread-and-butter workhorse images. Most users will use the latest weekly that has been blessed as “recommended”. There are three noteworthy things about the weekly images. First, they are the feedstock for “recommended”; second, it is always a particular weekly image that is chosen as the basis for a release image; and third, we make claim that the weekly image is going to be fit-for-purpose and therefore not utterly broken.
1.7.1 Tag Format¶
Weekly tags are of the form w_[year]_[week]
, e.g. w_2021_19
.
They may have additional cycle and rest components;
w_2021_19_c0019.001
is an acceptable weekly tag, for instance, as is
w_2021_19_20210513
or indeed w_2021_19_c0019.001_20210513
.
1.7.2 Display Name¶
The display name is Weekly [year]_[week]
; w_2021_19
has the
display name Weekly 2021_19
. As with releases and release
candidates, additional components are formatted and appended. Thus
w_2021_19_c0019.001
would have the display name
Weekly 2021_19 (SAL Cycle 0019, Build 001)
.
1.7.3 Semantic Version¶
A weekly’s semantic version is [year].[week].0
. w_2021_19
has
the version 2021.19.0
. Any additional components are used as the
semver build
string (with underscores replaced by periods), so
w_2021_19_c0019.001
would become 2021.19.0+c0019.001
.
1.8 Daily¶
Daily images are, as the name implies, produced every night. They are not guaranteed to work. They are generally used only by users needing bleeding-edge features that haven’t made it into a weekly yet.
1.8.1 Tag Format¶
Daily tags are of the format d_[year]_[month]_[day]
; as with weekly
builds, additional underscore-separated components may exist.
1.8.2 Display Name¶
A Daily display name is Daily [year]_[month]_[day]
, so
d_2021_05_11
becomes Daily 2021_05_11
. Additional components
are handled as for weeklies.
1.8.3 Semantic Version¶
The version for a daily image is [year].[month].[day]
.
d_2021_05_11
is simply 2021.05.11
. Additional components go
into the build string, as for other image types.
1.9 Release Candidate¶
A release candidate follows the same rules as a release, except that it
will have one and only one additional component, rc[number]
, which
is an incrementing sequence number.
1.9.1 Tag Format¶
The tag format is exactly that of a release format, with an additional
underscore-separated component, rc[number]
. Cycle and rest are
permitted.
1.9.2 Display Name¶
The display name resembles a Release version, except that it begins with
“Release Candidate”; the additional component will be appended with a
dash (to match the semantic version string). r22_0_0_rc1
will
have the display name Release Candidate r22.0.0-rc1
.
1.9.3 Semantic Version¶
The primary components of the version are the same as release: major,
minor, patch (in general, patch will be 0
because it will be a
prerelease). rc[number]
will be used as the prerelease (rather than
the build) field. Thus, r22_0_0_rc1
will have the version
22.0.0-rc1
, and r22_0_0_rc1_c0020.003_20210609
would have the
version 22.0.0-rc1+c0020.003.20210609
.
1.10 Experimental¶
Experimental tags are used mostly by people working on the Lab machinery
itself (which is to say, mostly the author of this technote at this
point). They start with exp_
and that’s really all you can say
about them (but see below).
1.10.1 Tag Format¶
The experimental tag starts with exp_
. In practice (and largely as
an artifact of the build process), it often looks like
exp_[some-other-tag]_[descriptor]
, e.g. exp_w_2021_13_nosudo
.
1.10.2 Display Name¶
My preference is to try the strategy hinted at above: the first word of
the display name is “Experimental”, and then the rest of the tag
following exp_
is fed through the display name parsing process
again; much of the time this will result in a sane display name string.
For instance exp_w_2021_13_nosudo
would yield
Experimental Weekly 2021_13 [nosudo]
. If that re-parse fails, just
use the string following exp_
as the name. For instance
exp_ajt_test
would give the display name Experimental ajt_test
.
1.10.3 Semantic Version¶
Experimentals will not have a semantic version string. The only way to sort them is lexigraphically by tag, and no temporal information is implied.
1.10.4 Unknown Images¶
Any image whose tag is not parseable according to any of the above
categories falls into an unknown
type. Fundamentally these are
handled rather like experimentals. There is no display name separate
from the tag string, and there is no semantic version. They have no
sort order other than lexigraphic.